[CM] most efficient way to map over a vector?
Elijah Stone
elronnd at elronnd.net
Sat Apr 2 17:47:39 PDT 2022
Sorry, should be
(do ((i 0 (+ 1 i))
(l (length v)))
((>= i l))
(float-vector-set! v i (f (float-vector-ref v i))))
On Sat, 2 Apr 2022, Elijah Stone wrote:
> Probably:
>
> (do ((i 0 (+ 1 i))
> (l (length v)))
> (>= i l)
> (float-vector-set! v i (f (float-vector-ref v i))))
>
> Obviously substituting int-vector-* or byte-vector-* if appropriate.
>
> That said, if performance is really important, I might just write the code in
> c.
>
> On Sat, 2 Apr 2022, Iain Duncan wrote:
>
>> Hi all, I'm mapping some transforms over vectors in a part of the code that
>> I need to have run as efficiently as possible. I'm hoping someone can tell
>> me what the fastest running approach to this is. I would like to leave the
>> data as vector as it is used in a framebuffer at the C level.
>> thanks!
>> iain
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Cmdist mailing list
> Cmdist at ccrma.stanford.edu
> https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist
>
More information about the Cmdist
mailing list