From phiroc at free.fr  Wed Jul  6 13:39:07 2011
From: phiroc at free.fr (Philippe de Rochambeau)
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 22:39:07 +0200
Subject: [CM] channel-tuning 108
Message-ID: <85179B90-128F-4647-9709-D1FA3A1B48BD@free.fr>

Hello,

on page 140 of Notes from the Metalevel, the author set the :channel-tuning parameter to 108 in Interaction 2.

According to the CM2 documentation which is available on the Web, :channel-tuning should not exceed 16. Why is it equal to 108 here and what does that value mean?

Furthermore, what is the equivalent on :channel-tuning 108 in CM3? send("midi:tuning", <value>) ?

Many thanks.

Philippe








From bil at ccrma.Stanford.EDU  Sun Jul 10 11:24:48 2011
From: bil at ccrma.Stanford.EDU (Bill Schottstaedt)
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2011 11:24:48 -0700
Subject: [CM] Snd 12.3
Message-ID: <20110710182332.M53544@ccrma.Stanford.EDU>

Snd 12.3

  removed the profiling option in s7.

  all my time in this version went into trying to make s7 faster. 
    I believe it is now 3 times as fast as it was in early May.

  Unless someone objects violently, I'm going to remove the multithreading
    support from s7.  It has turned out to be less useful than I hoped,
    mainly because s7 threads share the heap and therefore have to coordinate
    all cell allocations.  So it's faster, and simpler to use multiple
    pthreads each running a separate s7 interpreter, rather than one s7
    running multiple s7 threads.  In clm, the contention is for access to
    the output stream, so the gain in speed is not always something to
    brag about.  And begin_hook handles GUI-related problems without
    any threads.  Last but not least, the effort to make the non-threaded
    s7 faster has messed up parts of the threaded version.  Rather than
    waste a lot of time fixing this, I'd rather just flush the stuff.

  Due to changes in Gtk, functions like gtk_vbox_new are no longer
    defined in libxm.  This means that several of the gtk-related
    scheme files in the Snd tarball now only work in Gtk 3.0 or later.


checked: gmp 5.0.2, sbcl 1.0.49, gtk 3.1.6|8 (but it looks like crap),
         fftw 3.3beta

Thanks!: Mike Scholz, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano, Rick Taube



From publst at btconnect.com  Fri Jul 15 02:44:02 2011
From: publst at btconnect.com (publst)
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 10:44:02 +0100
Subject: [CM] Rewrite
Message-ID: <BA821EDE-91A4-40C2-A1C4-AA7381C2C980@btconnect.com>

CM2 had the 'rewrite' pattern class which appears to be absent from CM3.

What would be an equivalent process in CM3 that would achieve results similar to 'rewrite' in CM2?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://cm-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/cmdist/attachments/20110715/127ce30f/attachment.html>