From hardbop200 at gmail.com Tue Jan 4 17:07:26 2011 From: hardbop200 at gmail.com (Josh Lawrence) Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 19:07:26 -0600 Subject: [CM] cm or clm? Message-ID: hello everyone! please confuse my ignorance on this, but I'm a little confused...is there a difference between common music: http://commonmusic.sourceforge.net/ ...and common lisp music: https://ccrma.stanford.edu/software/clm/ I was looking at this post, thinking doing something like this would be a lot of fun: http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/pipermail/cmdist/2005-August/002556.html I have found myself chasing rabbits down endless holes, without any sort of idea what I'm doing :) I could use some help! one more question, the common lisp music download lists a README.clm, with instructions as to how to install the dependancies, but no instruction as to how to install it or use it. I ran the ./configure script and that passed just fine, but make fails: configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating mus-config.h config.status: mus-config.h is unchanged config.status: creating sndlib.h config.status: sndlib.h is unchanged [clm-4]$ make make: *** No targets specified and no makefile found. Stop. clearly I'm missing something...can someone point me in the right direction? thank you! Josh -- Josh Lawrence www.hardbop200.com From bil at ccrma.Stanford.EDU Wed Jan 5 02:34:44 2011 From: bil at ccrma.Stanford.EDU (Bill Schottstaedt) Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 02:34:44 -0800 Subject: [CM] cm or clm? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20110105103018.M76006@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> README.clm, under "How To Build CLM" says: start lisp and (load "all.lisp") There is an introduction to CLM in clm.html, and lots of example note lists. CLM is aimed at sound synthesis whereas CM is aimed at composition. CM can use CLM. From bil at ccrma.Stanford.EDU Fri Jan 7 03:34:12 2011 From: bil at ccrma.Stanford.EDU (Bill Schottstaedt) Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 03:34:12 -0800 Subject: [CM] Snd 11.12 Message-ID: <20110107113302.M8433@ccrma.Stanford.EDU> Snd 11.12 s7: *gc-stats* member and assoc have an optional 3rd arg, the comparison function added environment? in the gtk 3 version of Snd, there is no longer a -nogtkrc flag, and Snd.gtkrc is obsolete (Gtk has moved to a css-style system, but I think in gtk 3 I'll leave all the "theme" stuff to the global theme). in gtk2, only versions 2.10 or later are supported. checked: gtk 2.91.5|6|7, sbcl 1.0.45 Thanks!: Mike Scholz From aykut_caglayan at yahoo.com Tue Jan 18 10:23:53 2011 From: aykut_caglayan at yahoo.com (Aykut Caglayan) Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:23:53 -0800 (PST) Subject: [CM] midi-time-signature Message-ID: <587851.24369.qm@web45703.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Is it not implemented "midi-time-signature" in cm3? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From taube at uiuc.edu Sat Jan 22 07:41:48 2011 From: taube at uiuc.edu (Heinrich Taube) Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 09:41:48 -0600 Subject: [CM] midi-time-signature In-Reply-To: <587851.24369.qm@web45703.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> References: <587851.24369.qm@web45703.mail.sp1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <710CB445-64F8-436A-B890-A65098F96DBA@uiuc.edu> hi aykut -- ill take a look and see, it should be there ! On Jan 18, 2011, at 12:23 PM, Aykut Caglayan wrote: > Is it not implemented "midi-time-signature" in cm3? > >