[CM] clm4

[Rick Taube]

it would be neat, one could distribute a libclm with all clm-3  
insruments already linked in. the user wouldnt need a compiler to  
work with the instruments or to even compile clm sources. and guis  
for experimenting with parameters wouldnt need  lisp at all. that  
would be great for teaching... also if clm also had some kind of port  
that you could open ( addition to sound files...) then would it be  
possible to call an instruemtn from the repl say always with a zero  
beg arg? i dont know is this could be done maybe it doesnt work with  
sample based approach (which i like)


(load "libclm.so")
(load "myviolin.lisp")
(clm-open-sound-port :srate 44100 :channels 2)
(my-violin 0 1 440 .4)
(loop repeat 5
    do (my-violin 0 1 (+ (random 220) 220) .1)
    (wait .4))




On Feb 7, 2008, at 1:17 PM, Bill Schottstaedt wrote:

> an interesting idea -- I'll have to poke at it.  I've been moving
> away from original form over the years (clm-3 moved generator
> allocation into C, for example, and uses clm.c for all the generator
> innards).  It's been so long now, that
> I can't remember why definstrument passes everything in
> int and double arrays.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cmdist mailing list
> Cmdist@ccrma.stanford.edu
> http://ccrma-mail.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/cmdist